
Like an engine in an internal combustion automobile, the human body has an optimal rate of turnover to maximize the efficiency of energy usage. If that previous sentence didn't make much sense to you, fear not, I will give a quick real world analogy: if it takes more gas to make your car go faster, it will be mostly worth as far as gas is concerned it because you will be getting to your destination faster and thus burning overall less fuel. So you can burn more fuel for less time, or you can burn less fuel for more time, but at a certain point, you will have reached your peak efficiency where you will be balancing the amount of fuel that you are burning with the speed that you are going to overall burn the least amount of fuel getting to your destination.
Apparently, scientists applied all of their fancy calculations and measurements to human beings and found out the peak efficiency pace for running, a sport that is near and dear to our hearts. In the study, they found that on average, a male running at a 7:13 minutin miglia will achieve peak efficiency while a female will have to run 9:08 miglia. At these speeds, you can run a given distance and utilize the lowest amount of energy possible.
Now let's be honest here folks: when I run, I am not particularly worried about achieving max efficiency. In fact, to lose weight, it makes sense to achieve the least efficient stride, which by the way happens at a walk-run pace of 13:00 minutin miglia. However, these findings are somewhat interesting for longer races like the marathon, where the infamous "wall" is hit by depleting your energy stores.
I used some of my fancy academic connections to get a copy of the original study and will tell you, the data is surprisingly good. You would think that there would be a ton of variability, but there isn't. It seems that this max efficiency is pretty standard across humans. However, they also found that the efficicency was correlated with weight and height, meaning that different humans who look different will have different efficiencies. At the end of the day, I think that this study is really just pointing out a quantitative difference in how different sized people function: the further you are away from the norm, which is surprisingly standard, the more differently you perform.
Read (original study), Enjoy (yahoo! story), Comment (makes me feel human)!
Ed Note: That picture above was from a google image search of efficiency; apparently, it is a more efficient way to butter your toast.









